ES

EN

The Design, Organize, Execute, and Sustain (DOES) framework and the Adizes PAEI model

The Design Organize Execute and Sustain (DOES) framework and the PAEI model developed by Dr. Ichak Adizes are both management frameworks designed to help organizations improve their performance and achieve their strategic goals. While both frameworks have similarities, they also have distinct differences worth exploring. The PAEI model is based on the belief that every … Read more

The PAEI model and the DOES framework can be complementary approaches to management and organizational performance improvement.

The Design Organize Execute and Sustain (DOES) framework and the PAEI model developed by Dr. Ichak Adizes are both management frameworks designed to help organizations improve their performance and achieve their strategic goals. While both frameworks have similarities, they also have distinct differences worth exploring.

The PAEI model is based on the belief that every organization requires four essential roles for effective management: Producer (P), Administrator (A), Entrepreneur (E), and Integrator (I). These roles are defined as follows:

  • Producers are responsible for the organization’s day-to-day operations, ensuring that products or services are delivered efficiently and effectively.
  • Administrators are responsible for ensuring that the organization’s resources are used efficiently and effectively and adhere to policies and procedures.
  • Entrepreneurs are responsible for identifying opportunities for growth and innovation and for developing new products, services, or business models.
  • Integrators are responsible for ensuring that the different functions and departments within the organization are working together effectively and that there is clear communication and collaboration across the organization.

The PAEI model is based on the premise that organizations must balance these four roles to be effective. A lack of balance can lead to dysfunction and poor performance.

The DOES framework, on the other hand, is focused on a structured approach to continuous improvement that emphasizes strategic planning and execution, resource allocation, and sustainability. The framework consists of four stages: Design, Organize, Execute, and Sustain.

In the Design stage, organizations define their strategic goals and objectives and develop a plan of action to achieve them. In the Organize stage, resources are structured to support the execution of the plan. In the Execute stage, the plan is implemented, and progress is monitored. In the Sustain stage, the results are evaluated, and adjustments are made to ensure that the improvements are sustainable over the long term.

While the PAEI model and the DOES framework have different approaches and emphases, they have some similarities. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of a balanced approach to management, with attention paid to strategic planning, resource allocation, and operational execution. Both frameworks also recognize the importance of continuous improvement and sustainability in achieving long-term success.

However, the PAEI model focuses more on defining specific organizational roles. At the same time, the DOES framework is focused on a structured approach to continuous improvement that can be applied across different roles and functions within an organization. The PAEI model emphasizes the importance of balancing these roles, while the DOES framework emphasizes the importance of a structured approach to problem-solving and decision-making.

The PAEI model and the DOES framework are useful tools for organizations seeking to improve their performance and achieve their strategic goals. The PAEI model emphasizes the importance of balancing specific roles within an organization, while the DOES framework emphasizes the importance of a structured approach to continuous improvement. By understanding the similarities and differences between these frameworks, organizations can choose the one that best fits their needs and goals and implement it effectively to achieve sustainable improvements in organizational performance.

Insights

Four decision quadrants mapped by knowledge and control

The Four Quadrants of Decision Making

Decision-making rests on two invariant dimensions—what is known and what is controlled. Mapping choices across these axes reveals four quadrants that organize routine operations, adaptive responses, discovery-driven innovation, and crisis navigation. When leaders treat decisions as an iterative mosaic rather than a single event, they convert ambiguity into coordinated action across appropriate management horizons.
Illustration showing how good leadership can guide a team

What Leadership is and What it is Not

Leadership is not a title, a toolkit, or a personality. Properly understood, it is a relationship that creates direction, fosters alignment, and sustains commitment amid uncertainty—distinct from management’s reliability and stewardship’s continuity.
Diagram of the loop linking tending inside Autonomy Nodes to stewardship

Weaving Tending and Stewardship into Coherent Organizations

Tending is the day-to-day care that keeps teams human; stewardship is long-horizon guardianship of identity and ethics. Don’t conflate them. Link them with a simple loop, clarify commitments, translate to node practices, elevate signals, require steward response, and audit both. The result is principled speed grounded in trust and clear boundaries.
Read More

Tags

Adizes, Anker Bioss, Bioss, DOES, Executive Search, Mexico Recruiters, PAEI