Archive

Archive for September, 2009

Have you seen my team? I need to find them, I’m their leader.

September 30th, 2009

It’s not a cliche. Leadership is not about the leader, yet many forget.
By Jose Ruiz

If you collected every single article that defines leadership, you’d probably have reading material for a many years and you’d probably go crazy with ideas and suggestions on how to improve your leadership skills.

Leadership is much like parenting. You can read a lot, you can be taught, you can be mentored and guided, but in the end your leadership style will be unique to your experiences and specific situations. There will seldom be black or white answers. However, just like parenting, the one irrefutable characteristic about true leadership is that it is not about you. Good leadership is not reflected in the leader’s actions, it is reflected in the impact and effect of those actions on the team.

This is not a plea for servant leadership, a humble leader, leading from the back, or leading softly. I believe in that, but I don’t believe a good leader can, or should be that all the time.  A leader should adapt to the environment and what the team needs today without losing sight of what will be needed tomorrow and always preparing for that moment when he or she will no longer be there. Guaranteeing the growth and sustainability of the team and the individuals that comprise it beyond the leader’s time is the ultimate trait of a great leader. In fact, the true success of a leader can not be measured without considering the results of the succession plan.


Jose Ruiz is a Principal in Heidrick & Struggles’ Monterrey office. As an executive recruiter he has worked on executive search projects for multinational clients in industrial sectors and consumer markets.

About Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
The world’s premier provider of senior-level executive search and leadership consulting services. The firm’s executive recruiters and leadership experts operate from principal business centers in North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific. In Mexico, Heidrick & Struggles operates offices in Mexico City and Monterrey. For more information about Heidrick & Struggles please visit www.heidrick.com

Drive It (Book), Leadership , , , , , ,

The pay increase you should expect when changing jobs

September 12th, 2009

By Jose Ruiz

How much?  There is no easy answer for this question but the best way to address is it is to understand a company’s typical thought process.  Regardless of what companies will openly admit there are three things that will determine what a company will offer you when changing jobs:

What you are worth in the Market
This has nothing to do with your perceived value, it is important to distinguish your perceived value from your market value.  Your market value is simply based on what others with a similar skill set and experience (your competition) are currently or willing to make. I have had candidates tell me: “I saved the company $500,000 dollars last year why can’t they pay me 50% more?” And the answer is pretty straight forward, harsh, but straight forward: Because they don’t have to if someone else can save them the same amount for 25% less than what you make.

So, research the market when setting your expectations. Once you arrive at market data it is important to understand how it is used.  If you take market statistics as a reference, consider that companies will try to make offers below the 50 percentile to guarantee room for growth and development. The area above that percentile is reserved for compensating performance and experience at the corresponding level.  If at any point you are able to negotiate above the 50 percentile be cautious of what your future will look like. You might be staring at a few years with below average salary increases.

Your current salary
This becomes a none-issue if you are at market, but if you are under the market it will force a question: Why are you below market?  In many cases there is a valid reason. But beware of how you present your case. Companies will know about other companies more that you might expect. Company names in your resume and your current salary will hint to what your performance has been. Questions marks will fly if you have been with a well recognized organization for the past 4 years and your salary is below market.  Regardless of how well the interview process goes and how good an organization may be when evaluating potential employees there is never a guarantee that a new hire will perform as expected. So if you are below market don’t expect a significant immediate increase to bring you to market level. Companies will typically provide an increase to bring you on board but it will be up to you to bring yourself to market level by performing.  So worry about positioning yourself in an organization that will FACILITATE getting back to market level within a certain amount of time versus trying to find a sponsor that will immediately take you there because they feel for you and believe your story.

It is also important to consider that while companies understand that money is important they will seek a candidate’s decision based on the challenge, expected career path and career development and not on an immediate boost in pay. For that reason, most organizations will shy away from providing sharp increases when presenting an offer. The average increase, assuming that the increase does no put you outside the hiring companies range for the position is between 15-25%. The higher the salary the lower the percentage tends to be. In very few instances do we see organizations that are willing to increase an executive’s salary by more than 25% when they bring them on board. So once again, worry about positioning yourself in an organization that will provide a level of responsibility, training and experience that will allow you to progressively increase your market value and consequently your salary.
Chase responsibility and experience that can be marketed and the money will come.

Their internal pay structure
You would think that the pay structure in most companies would match market data. Unfortunately it is not always the case and not because organizations would not want it that way. External events can change the market quicker than what a company can or would be willing to react to. When we see a mismatch it is typically a temporary supply and demand issue for specific industries and disciplines. In most instances companies will prefer to take more time to fill a job opening or even lose a few employees to a hot job market over turning their cost structure upside down or generate disgruntled employees by increasing the salary range for specific positions while keeping other similar ones the same.


Jose Ruiz is a Principal in Heidrick & Struggles’ Monterrey office. As an executive recruiter he has worked on executive search projects for multinational clients in industrial sectors and consumer markets.

About Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
The world’s premier provider of senior-level executive search and leadership consulting services. The firm’s executive recruiters and leadership experts operate from principal business centers in North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific. In Mexico, Heidrick & Struggles operates offices in Mexico City and Monterrey. For more information about Heidrick & Struggles please visit www.heidrick.com

Drive It (Book), Job Market, Mexico Executive Search , , , ,

2010 | Say hello to my little friends: Inflation and loss of purchasing power

September 6th, 2009

connieandpeteWhat can we expect in 2010 as we continue to see signs the economy is beginning to recover and expand?  Uncertainty is gone. We’re certain it’s going to be a tough year but challenges will be different from those we encountered in 2009.
By Jose Ruiz

When 2009 began uncertainty filled the air and the economy paralyzed. It was like driving in dense fog. Trying to sort out what was around us, while we attempted to move forward with caution, hoping nothing would come out of nowhere and hit us. Swine flu did just that and it was not until June that the fog began to lift. We hit bottom, and it became evident that the recovery was going to take time and it was going to be tough.

Let’s take a broad look back at what happened from the perspective of Connie Consumer and Pete Producer. Back in 2006 Connie Consumer was flying high with a steady job, a house, retirement and investment accounts with values that were growing well beyond inflation. The Consumer family’s net worth was growing at a steady pace and they felt comfortable making major purchases. Pete Producer was doing very well struggling to keep up with demand. Pete and Producer Inc. hired more employees and made investments with an eye to the future. He needed to expand to not lose market share.

In 2008 Connie Consumer began to see her net worth slip as house prices began to drop. The foreclosure of her neighbor’s house put downward pressure on the price of her home and her investments were not performing well. The Consumer family is a responsible consumer so they began to hold back on some spending. Pete producer began to notice the Consumers where not spending as much as before and began to see his demand fizzle. Producer Inc. was already set for higher output. Pete producer made small adjustments but his inventory began to accumulate. Pete felt he had increased capacity too aggressively betting on the come and allowed his costs to get out of control. Towards the end of 2008 he had no choice and began to make cost adjustments and had to let some employees go.

By the start of 2009 Connie Consumer was facing a pay-cut and was uncertain about her own job. She could no longer count on the safety net of her home equity or her investment accounts. If she lost her job she would have a hard time making ends meet. The Consumer family hunkered down and increased their savings trying to spend only on the essentials. Pete Producer felt the pressure as his products stacked up in his warehouse. Producer Inc. had no choice and made deeper cost cuts, letting more people go and shutting down plants. Pete was in trouble. His costs were climbing and his product was not selling. Pete needed cash at a time when his bank reduced his credit line. He knew that increasing his prices would be suicide. In fact he had to provide discounts to empty his shelves. He accepted losses to guarantee cash flow.

At the end of June 2009 Connie felt a bit more secure at her job. Layoffs appeared to be over. The Consumer family was still dealing with lower pay because of the pay-cuts but they felt a bit more comfortable spending. Government programs had helped Pete reduce his inventory and Producer Inc. began to see demand come back.

So this is where we are today. Connie Consumer is cautious but spending. Pete Producer has his production lines working again. His reduced capacity is almost at its limit.

The uncertainty is gone but now comes a tricky recovery.

Pete Producer is seeing demand increase but he is very reluctant to increase capacity. His fear of loosing market share is outweighed by his fear of letting his costs get out of control. He will accept losing some customers to guarantee that he will stay afloat and profitable. Pete will grow at a very slow pace keeping a close eye on the Consumer family betting very little on the come.

Connie Consumer will probably get her full pay back by the end of the year. But her employer will be thinking along the same lines as Pete and will keep pay increases in check. In 2010 Connie will likely earn the same salary she did in 2008.

Now say hello to my little friends: inflation and loss of purchasing power.

2009 was a year characterized by the elimination of excess inventory and capacity (supply). When I talk about capacity it’s not only manufacturing capacity. Restaurants, dealerships and stores were closed, production lines were shut down. Overall, capacity to provide goods and services was reduced in reaction to a dramatic drop in demand. Prices remained mostly in check because supply outweighed demand.

Through the reminder of 2009 and 2010 demand will continue to grow at a slow pace. Supply and demand will even out and we will very likely see inflation levels above those that we saw in 2009. 

Higher inflation levels and a virtual freeze in salaries equals a loss in purchasing power adding another element to the already strong argument of a slow recovery.

2010 will be a year of recovery. But a slow and difficult recovery as Connie Consumer and Pete Producer keep an eye on each other before taking any steps, both protecting their cash and taking nothing for granted.


Jose Ruiz is a Principal in Heidrick & Struggles’ Monterrey office. As an executive recruiter he has worked on executive search projects for multinational clients in technology, life sciences, industrial sectors and consumer markets.

About Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
The world’s premier provider of senior-level executive search and leadership consulting services. The firm’s executive recruiters and leadership experts operate from principal business centers in North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific. In Mexico, Heidrick & Struggles operates offices in Mexico City and Monterrey. For more information about Heidrick & Struggles please visit www.heidrick.com

Economy, Mexico Industry , , , , , , , , ,

Jose J. Ruiz | Executive Recruiter
Heidrick & Struggles | Executive Search in Mexico